Pentecostal Lights

Pastor. James

The central thesis contrasts two opposing models of priesthood: the land-owning, ritual-based Egyptian priesthood versus the landless, faith-dependent Levitical priesthood of Israel. This comparison serves as a powerful critique of modern Christian materialism, where leaders are depicted as amassing wealth like Egyptian priests while their congregations struggle. The sermon posits that the true calling for believers, as the “seed of Abraham,” is to embrace the Levitical model—a nomadic life of faith (”walk and wander”) characterized by total dependence on God’s provision rather than on tangible assets like jobs, savings, or property. The ultimate purpose of this lifestyle is to function as a “Royal Priesthood” to the nations. This role encompasses six key duties: offering sacrifices, maintaining spiritual order, mediating between God and humanity, teaching divine law, acting as a “counter-culture” to societal ills, and ultimately, blessing the world. A significant warning is issued against the sin of “self-righteous indignation,” which is identified as the cause of the Second Temple’s destruction and a pervasive threat within the contemporary church.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Core Theological Argument: Two Models of Priesthood

The sermon builds its primary argument on a stark contrast between the priestly classes of ancient Egypt and ancient Israel, presenting them as archetypes for two divergent spiritual paths.

The Egyptian Model: A Negative Archetype

Economic Status: The Egyptian priests are highlighted as a landed class. Citing Genesis 47, the speaker notes that during the famine under Joseph, the priests did not have to sell their land because they received a direct subsidy from Pharaoh. They maintained their wealth and property while the general populace became landless serfs.

Spiritual Function: Their role is described as being purely ceremonial and ritualistic (”sadanngu sampirathayam“). They lacked a teaching ministry and were not responsible for instructing the people in divine law or truth.

Modern Parallel: This model is explicitly used to critique a perceived trend in modern Pentecostal and Charismatic Christianity. The speaker condemns a system where ministry leaders accumulate personal wealth, such as multiple properties (”a bungalow on Radial Road, a bungalow in Saidapet”), while their congregations live in financial precarity, often burdened by loans and rent. This is equated to the Egyptian priests prospering while the people became landless wanderers.

The Levitical Model: The Divine Ideal

Economic Status: In direct opposition to the Egyptian model, the Levite priests of Israel were landless. God Himself was their sole inheritance and portion. Their life is characterized by the phrase “walk and wander,” mirroring the nomadic faith of their patriarch, Abraham.

Spiritual Function: The Levites’ primary responsibility was to teach God’s laws, statutes, and judgments to the people of Israel. Their life of faith—depending on God’s direct provision, as described in Psalm 145:16 (”You open Your hand and satisfy the desire of every living thing”)—was integral to their teaching authority. Their ministry was not limited to rituals but was deeply instructional and judicial.

Positional Importance: The Levites were strategically placed “in the midst of the camp” (Numbers 2:17), signifying their central and indispensable role in the spiritual life and order of the nation.

Thematic Contrast: A Life of Faith vs. A Life of Sight

The sermon extends the core priestly contrast to the life choices of all believers, using the examples of Abraham and Lot.

Lot’s Choice (Reliance on Sight): Lot chose the plains of the Jordan because they were visibly “well-watered,” resembling the Garden of Eden and the land of Egypt. This is interpreted as a metaphor for a life based on tangible, predictable resources. The sermon identifies these “water sources” as:

The Jordan River: One’s job and regular income.

The Rivers of Eden: One’s bank balance, savings, and financial deposits.

The Nile River: One’s fixed assets, such as land, property, and gold.

Abraham’s Path (Reliance on Faith): Abraham’s calling was to “walk and wander” as a tent-dweller, without a fixed home. The land promised to his descendants is described in Deuteronomy 11 as a land of hills and valleys that “drinks water from the rain of heaven.” This is presented as a superior model because it forces a continuous, moment-by-moment dependence on God, who alone controls the heavens. If the people strayed, God could “shut up the heavens,” making their survival dependent on obedience and faith, not on a permanent water source.

The Believer’s Calling: A Royal Priesthood

Based on Exodus 19:5-6, the sermon asserts that the ultimate calling for God’s people is to become a “kingdom of priests and a holy nation.” This status is conditional upon hearing and obeying God’s voice, which is communicated through the divinely appointed Levitical ministry. To fulfill this destiny of being priests to the nations, believers must first embrace the six core functions of the priesthood internally.

Principal Warning: The Danger of Self-Righteousness

A recurring and forceful theme is the condemnation of “suya needhiyin aangaram“ (the arrogance/indignation of self-righteousness).

Historical Consequence: The speaker identifies this as the specific sin that led to the destruction of the Second Temple and the 2,000-year exile of the Jewish people. During that period, scholars and leaders allegedly established their own righteousness, leading to “causeless hatred” and internal division.

Contemporary Threat: This is presented as a grave danger in the modern church, particularly within Pentecostalism. The speaker warns that many ministers and believers are ignorant of this principle, leading them to make their own judgments and establish their own standards of righteousness, thereby rejecting God’s divinely instituted order and authority. This is seen as the root of disobedience and spiritual failure.

Illustrative Anecdotes and Testimonies

To reinforce the theological arguments, the speaker employs several personal stories and a literary allegory.

The Parable of the Russian Lawyer: A story is recounted of a banker and a lawyer who make a bet. The lawyer agrees to 15 years of solitary confinement to win two million. During his isolation, he reads voraciously—philosophy, science, and the Bible—and concludes that the world and its wealth are “vanity.” He renounces the prize just before his term ends. This story illustrates the Levitical principle of separation from the world to gain divine wisdom.

Personal Ministry Testimony: The speaker states that for 32 years, he has ministered without accumulating personal wealth, a bank balance, or property. For 30 of those years, he claims he did not even touch the offering box, leaving it to the control of others to exemplify a life of dependence.

The Ephemerality of Wealth: Stories of close friends who suffered catastrophic financial losses (one losing 70 lakhs in a land deal, another losing 1 crore in a divorce settlement) are used to demonstrate the folly of trusting in earthly assets, reinforcing the sermon’s central theme of faith over reliance on material security.